CO129-526-9 Engagement agreements of officers 24-5-1930 - 16-1-1931 — Page 4

in agreements & I do not think it should be

done. The Gov. does not suggest it.

(3) I

appee to the amendment suggested

Gy for Bickle at B, except that, as this is by per.

disciplined force from which a constable

a

way

be diimiord, I it would be safer to read

or

In the event of his being dismissed, leaving the Force inthintire year cts"

XVIII

Argads the addition suggested for section XU!!!

the difficulty is that practically all the rections refer only to what is provided in the Colony. To

me rection might

make that exflict in

raise doubts as to whether the others afflied chewhere, I think we had better dd

" while in the "Llory" at the end of rection KIC, rafter charges in the first sentence of

rection XIII; and add " in the "Sony" after Atendance in fary 21 FU!!! and after

'" richness' in first line of

as

X/X

L

J. A. Calder

4.11.30

as proposed by how to alter. The 3 months

bowns is what we ached H. Rong to agree to of although the bouns system is open its objectivi (vide uvantes on 70080/3. al.

Personnel

there is no reason

thold this up pending cossos. of the proposald